|
‘Dawn
of the Dead: Ultimate Edition’ (1978, Anchor Bay)
Directed by George Romero
George Romero’s ‘Dawn of the Dead’ has seen
numerous incarnations on home video, but this one truly lives up to its
billing as the “ultimate” version. The four disc set includes the U.S.
theatrical cut, the international cut supervised by producer Dario
Argento and released as ‘Zombi’, and the extended Cannes film festival
cut that has in the past been erroneously referred to as the “director’s
cut” (Romero’s preferred version is actually the U.S. theatrical cut).
But now you, the consumer, get to decide which version you like best.
In addition to the three versions of the film, disc
four includes two documentaries. Roy Frumkes ‘Document of the Dead’
(missing a few scenes that dealt with the sequel to this film, ‘Day of
the Dead’), and a newly made production feature with plenty of recent
interviews with cast and crew. Scattered throughout the four discs are
also a wealth of other bonus materials including trailers, TV spots,
photo galleries, and Easter eggs containing interviews that didn’t make
the final cut of the new documentary. But wait, there’s still more.
Each version of the film has its own commentary. Romero, his wife and
assistant director Christine, and special effects artist Tom Savini talk
over the U.S. theatrical cut, actors Ken Foree, Scott Reininger, Gaylen
Ross, and David Emgee offer up a jovial talk on the international cut,
and producer Richard Rubenstein still manages to offer some unique
information on the Cannes version.
So are three versions of this film really
necessary? Believe it or not, yes. Each version has its own tone, and
its own set of strengths and weaknesses. The differences between the
U.S. and international versions are especially notable. Romero’s
version plays up his themes of mass consumerism and includes much more
humor. The international version goes more for a straight up
action/horror approach. Each version is also scored differently and
includes scenes not in any other version. Some lines are even spoken by
different actors in different cuts. My only complaint is that some of
the photo galleries didn’t work on my DVD player. Don’t even think
about renting this, go out and buy it. Unlike the recent remake, which
was okay but ultimately forgettable, this is a movie you’ll watch again
and again if you’re a true horror fan. (Bob Ignizio) |
‘Exorcist:
The Beginning’ (2004, Theatrical Release)
Directed by Renny
Harlin
A long time ago, this
guy named Renny Harlin directed a movie called ‘Prison’. It was about a
dead prisoner returning to seek vengeance, since he was wrongly
executed. This movie was a fantastic late 80's gore fest. It has
moderately interesting characters and some impressive special effects.
The plot was mostly cliché, but it was put to film with a feisty energy
that made is much better than a lot of similarly themed horror movies
that came out at that time. Harlin’s ‘Die Hard 2’ came after that.
Everything since then has been bomb after bomb, letdown after letdown.
Movies like ‘Cutthroat Island’, ‘Long Kiss Good Night’, ‘Driven’, etc.,
with Harlin seemingly never living up the talent that his earlier
feature had promised. So it comes as no surprise that his version of an
Exorcist prequel is junk of the worst kind. It should also be stated
that Paul Schrader directed this film first, but was fired after he
would not add things (at the studios insistence) to his finished
product. So Renny Harlin took over. Minimal footage from the Schrader
filmed version is used.
The plot follows
Father Merrin through his earlier years, to East Africa, where we see
how he loses his faith and later on, regains it. I guess a prequel to
the "scariest movie ever" (not in my opinion) should have been scary,
right? That is not the case. Most of the scares here are generic,
lifted from any random slasher movie, and are of the "character jumps
into frame" variety. Stellen Skarsgard is good here, excellent in
fact. He has long been a supporting actor and here he shows he is
perfectly capable of carrying a film. It is just a shame that this was
not a good film he was given. And once again, the biggest downfall of
this movie was the use of CGI. Way too much CGI. And not even good
CGI, but rather CGI of the distracting and annoying type. So
distracting to the point where a scene would play out and the effect
would look completely out of place in the scene. And the real life make
up effects that are here are just as bad.
Don't get me wrong, I
wanted this to be great as much as the next guy. I wanted to go and see
a great scary horror movie, the kind you remember for years and want to
see over and over again. That's what I hope for. But instead, we get
another movie that replaces real scares with cheap CGI and horror
gimmicks. I was very disappointed and I gladly file this right behind
‘Alien Versus Predator’ as another disastrous movie that had such great
potential. (Edward Black) |