I
was not a fan of Rob Zombie’s directorial debut, ‘House of 1000
Corpses’. It showed a filmmaker who truly wanted to make a real
seventies style horror flick, but was far too derivative of ‘The Texas
Chain Saw Massacre’ to really be anything special. Not so with this
sequel. You really don’t need to have seen ‘House’ to know what’s going
on, so if you haven’t already, just keep it that way. ‘The Devil’s
Rejects’ is more of a violent action film than a horror flick, but I’m
sure horror fans will dig it just fine. If you’re squeamish, it won’t
really matter how well done this movie is, it’ll pretty much ruin your
day.
Here’s the plot. The Firefly family, a bunch of
sadistic killers introduced in ‘House of 1000 Corpses’, barely escape a
police raid led on their home by one Sherriff Wydell (William
Forsythe). The Fireflys killed Wydell’s brother in the last movie, and
he’s out for more than justice. He wants bloody, sadistic revenge.
Mother Firefly (Leslie Easterbrook) is captured, Tiny's (Matthew McGrory)
whereabouts are uncertain, but Otis (Bill Mosely) and Baby (Sherri Moon
Zombie) escape the opening shootout, and they soon meet up with their
father, Captain Spaulding (Sid Haig), who has been living on his own and
working as a clown. There’s a whole lot of sadism and gratuitous
violence in store for everyone, but also a lot of great dialogue, great
shots, and honest to goodness themes to ponder.
Really, this may just be the best movie of 2005 if
you can stomach it. It completely achieves everything it sets out to
do, and does so with style. There’s simply not a false note in this
movie. Granted, not everyone is going to want to watch a movie that so
gleefully wallows in the slime as this one does, but if you like your
movies dark you won’t find a better one. Where ‘House of 1000 Corpses’
shamelessly swiped from ‘Texas Chain Saw Massacre’, ‘Devil’s Rejects’
equals it in intensity while being it’s own film. In addition to the
actors already mentioned, who do amazing work, there are also roles for
such underused actors as E. G. Daily, Steve Railsback, Ken Foree,
Michael Berryman, Danny Trejo, Diamond Dallas Page, and P. J. Soles. No
Hollywood pretty faces, just real actors. What a concept. Anyway,
check this sucker out if you think you can handle it. (Bob Ignizio)
‘High Tension’ (2005, Lions Gate Films)
Directed by Alexandre Aja
Well,
here we go again. ‘High Tension’ is the latest in a recent string of films
that have been touted as a return to the sort of grim, unrelenting horror of
seventies drive-in and grindhouse fare like ‘Texas Chain Saw Massacre’,
‘Maniac’, ‘Last House on the Left’, and ‘The Hills Have Eyes’. But what do
you know, unlike ‘House of 1000 Corpses’ and all the remakes of old horror
flicks we’ve been deluged with lately, ‘High Tension’ actually lives up to
its hype. This is a film of intense brutality, excessive gore, and real
terror. ‘High Tension’ pulls no punches and offers no reprieve once the
carnage begins.
Marie (Cecile De France) and Alex (Maiwenn) are a
couple of college girls headed to the farmhouse where Alex’ parents live for
a holiday. A serial killer (Philippe Nahon) shows up and starts dispatching
the cast in extremely horrific ways. Marie eventually goes all Sigourney
Weaver and fights back. That’s pretty much it for plot. This is all told
in by Marie in flashback at a police station. At first, this seems to be a
detriment. After all, the movie is titled ‘High Tension’, but how much
tension can we feel for Marie when we already know she survives? Ah, but
there’s a twist.
The twist in ‘High Tension’ has been the cause of much
controversy. For many, it ruins the film. They don’t feel the movie
“played fair”. I disagree. The twist makes perfect sense, and clues are
given which you can catch better on a second viewing. You just have to
remember that what you’re watching is one person’s accounts of events, and
not a straight forward depiction of the events themselves. I think it would
have worked better if the filmmakers had gone with their original intent of
saving the reveal for the last scene, but that’s really a minor quibble. I
mean come on; many of the most vocal critics of this film’s twist are people
who have enshrined films like ‘Suspiria’ and ‘Phantasm’ as horror classics.
I love those movies, too, but compared to them ‘High Tension’ is a model of
coherency and straight forward storytelling.
Sadly, Lions Gate’s DVD of the film does not treat
‘High Tension’ with the respect it deserves. Don’t get me wrong, there are
some great extras, and the film itself looks and sounds good. But there’s
one huge issue. If you’re watching the original French language version of
the film (which you should, since only a moron prefers dubbing), the English
subtitles don’t entirely match up. Instead, they go with the English dub.
Which is completely stupid since the disc already includes close-captioning
of that version, as well as a second English subtitle option that only
subtitles the portions of the English dub left in their original French for
the U.S. release. I don’t know French, so I can’t tell how drastic the
differences are. But there are a couple scenes where there are subtitles
and no dialogue on the French track, and a couple scenes where there is
dialogue on the French track but no subs. ‘High Tension’ is not a dialogue
heavy move so it probably won’t hurt your viewing experience too much, but
it pisses me off that companies treat horror fans like we aren’t going to
notice or care about such things. There’s also an introduction to the film
by the director and his co-writer in French, and there’s no subtitles at all
for that. Way to go, assholes. So now if I want to buy this flick (which I
do), I have to sort through all the various import versions. Those of you
who don’t have a multi region player like I do, however, are stuck with this
disc, which simply can’t be considered definitive. (Bob Ignizio)
‘Last Days’ (2005, HBO Films)
Directed By Gus Van Sant
Let
it be said that I usually enjoy Gus Van Sant's work. I am not new to his
artsy style, and I really enjoyed ‘Elephant’. However, that being said,
‘Last Days’ may be the worst piece of garbage I've ever seen. It's
loosely based on Kurt Cobain (and I stress "loosely") and his last days
of life. Which in this movie is some other guy who wears the same
clothes Kurt did, and happens to play music. The person in the movie
wanders around the woods talking to himself for long periods of time.
And of course, Van Sant has to let us see that for long periods of time.
There are seriously scenes like 20 minutes long of a guy wandering in
the woods talking to himself. It's not very entertaining. It's like
"let's be artsy". It'd be cool if there was a point or purpose, but
there isn't. It's boring and pointless.
Several times in the movie, we are forced to stare
at a tree, or a door, for several minutes. Nothing happens in this
movie. There are people who live in the house with the Kurt lookalike,
and they basically sit around and sing along to the stereo. And we get
to see them sing the whole song. Add the fact, that there's Boyz II Men
playing sometimes on TV in the background, and at one point, that's all
you see for the whole video. If I wanted to watch a music video I would
have.
Other things parallel Cobain, like death, which in
this case appears to be an overdose or maybe suicide (no one really
says, since there's really no dialogue). But then the movie, just sort
of ends. Seriously, this movie is really bad. I wouldn't waste your
money buying or renting it. (Eddie Fleisher)
‘Saw 2’ (2005, Lions Gate Films)
Directed By Darren Lynn Bousman
I
was so excited to see the first Saw movie, but I remember being a little
disappointed with it. The story was unique, but the acting was quite
bad. This time around, all the problems the first one had are fixed.
‘Saw 2’ takes us to a new "game", this time being played on a police
officer played by Donnie Wahlberg, who puts in an impressive peformance.
Wahlberg's character isn't really aware the game is being played on him,
but sees it as being played on his son. If only he would listen.
The end of the first movie revealed the identity of
Jigsaw, and in the sequel he is seen without his mask for most of the
film. He's a frail cancer patient, who thinks people who don't
appreciate life should not be able to live. So he puts them in
situations to prove their worth. These situations usually lead to
gruesome deaths. This time he is caught after one of his players is
found dead, and the police uncover his headquarters.
There they find him, and screens showing a current
game in progress with several people in a house, including Wahlberg's
character's son and a girl named Amanda who was also in the first film
and survived her game. They spend the movie trying to find where the
game is taking place (without much help from Jigsaw) so they can try and
stop it. The ending of this movie and the surprises that are pulled are
well done, and make for a great plot. I won't ruin it by going any
further. This movie is full of blood and disgusting ways to die or be
cut up. But, it also features good acting, good writing, and a well
thought out plot. (Eddie Fleisher)