|
‘Fiancée of Dracula’ (Shriek Show, 2002)
Directed
by Jean Rollin
French director Jean Rollin has been exploring his romantic
obsession with the undead for five decades now, starting with his riot inducing
(really) 1968 gothic-erotic art film ‘Rape of the Vampire’ and continuing on up
to the present with this latest offering. If you’ve never seen a Rollin film
before, this makes a very good introduction. It’s far more coherent and
professional looking than some of his films, but still contains all the elements
that define his work; atmospheric locations, clueless “heroes”, sexy living dead
girls, and a strong sense of romanticism and mystery throughout.
Isabelle is being held captive by a group of nuns called
The Order of the White Virgin. Fated to be the bride of Dracula, her mere
presence exerts a powerful influence on her captors. This leads to bizarre
behavior by the sisters, including cigar smoking, goofy ranting, and a little
bit of lesbianism. The legions of the undead (a diminutive jester, a scantily
clad vampire girl, a baby eating blond who calls herself The Ogress, and a pair
of aged black magicians) plot to bust Drac’s betrothed out of the pokey. On the
side of “good”, a Van Helsing type and his apprentice are trying to get to
Isabelle first. Apparently if she and Drac hook up, then everyone’s favorite
lord of the vampires will be able to escape his prison. As usual, the director
seems to be rooting for the undead.
While the plot might sound like a recipe for cheese dip,
Rollin makes it compelling with his visual flair and sincerity. He reuses a
few bits from past films, notably the idea of a vampire emerging from a clock,
but this feels more like a culmination of his themes than an attempt at
rehashing them. It’s a shame that big budget Hollywood horror and hardcore
pornography have all but eliminated this sort of poetic erotic horror from the
marketplace. In a way, Rollin has become almost like his protagonists; a lonely
survivor from another time, still carrying on and yearning for an age long past.
(Bob Ignizio) |
‘The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers’ (New Line, 2002)
Directed
by Peter Jackson
I love a good sword and sorcery movie, and Peter Jackson’s
‘The Two Towers’ is in my opinion a great one. Of course a lot of the credit
goes to J.R.R. Tolkein for providing such excellent source material, but turning
book into film is a tricky business. For the most part, Jackson handles the
task admirably, although some purists might disagree. At three hours, the film
still has to gloss over or omit certain sequences in the book. Some characters
and events are condensed, and perhaps most controversial, Jackson expands on the
relationship between Aragorn (Vigo Mortensen) and Arwen (Liv Tyler), an element
of the plot which doesn’t figure at all into Tolkein’s book, and only merits
brief mentions in the first and third installments of his trilogy.
In general, however, Jackson stays more or less true to the
book. The segments with Frodo (Elijah Wood), Sam (Sean Astin), and Gollum (a
CGI creation voiced by Andy Serkes) are almost exactly as I imagined them.
Ditto for Merry, Pippin, and the Ents, and Gandalf’s (Ian McKellen) miraculous
return. Legendary horror star Christopher Lee as Saruman deservedly gets his
part beefed up a little, providing a more tangible foe to hate than the
disembodied eye that is Sauron, and Brad Douriff is perfect as the duplicitous
Wormtongue, one of Saruman’s spies. John Rhyss Davies as Gimli and Orlando
Bloom as Legolas also get some prime screen time kicking orc ass in the closing
battle scene at Helm’s Deep.
The biggest
problem with the film, and in my opinion a minor one, is with the events in
Rohan, kingdom of the horse lords, and the Battle of Helm’s Deep which takes
place there. A lot has been tweaked and altered in this segment. Jackson has
also added a battle sequence in which Aragorn falls over a cliff and is presumed
dead by his companions. This alteration is just plain stupid, unnecessary, and
repetitive considering we’ve already had one major character presumed dead show
up alive and well in the movie. Some of the new supporting characters, notably
Boromir’s brother Faramir, also behave differently than in the book and in my
opinion these changes are not in the movie’s favor. Minor misgivings aside, I
strongly recommend fans of intelligent fantasy/action films see this one on the
big screen. No doubt there will be an expanded edition released on DVD next
year that corrects some of the issues fans of the book might have with the film,
but this is the sort of movie fifty foot high screens were made for. (Bob
Ignizio) |